Latest News

Court Upholds Deferment of Payment After Business Fails
Mortgage Debt Not Regulated by Consumer Credit Act 1974
Undue Influence Claim Fails
IHT Changes For 'Non-Doms'
Businesswoman's £2.7 Million Divorce Award Upheld
Fair Comment Still Comes at a Cost
Court Rejects Will Made Under Undue Influence
National Trust Membership Rules Out Judge in Planning Dispute
Child Maintenance - What's New?
Start of Year Tax Planning
Will Invalid After Court Rules Witness Unlikely to Forget
Benefit Limitation Did Not Discriminate Against Gypsies
Court Provides Resolution to Potential Problem
Suspended Sentences for Non-Payment of Maintenance Quashed
How to Take Care of Your Pets After Your Death

Prisoners Unfairly Denied Consideration for Child Contact

Mothers serving a prison sentence who have sole caring responsibility for children under 16 years of age are normally allowed to spend up to three days every six months at home as the end of their sentence approaches. This is termed ‘childcare resettlement leave’ (CRL).

Recently, two women convicted of serious drug trafficking offences went to court to contest the CRL arrangements relating to their children. They argued that the regime applied was inflexible and took insufficient account of the merits of individual cases.

One of the women has three children under the age of 14 and the other has one child aged 15. The women were refused CRL because they were in the early phases of their sentences and, as a matter of routine, CRL is only granted to prisoners who are in the latter stages of their prison terms.

The two women argued that the denial of adequate contact with their children could have adverse consequences on their upbringing and could lead to an enhanced risk of the children becoming criminalised.

The High Court agreed that the use of a ‘blanket policy’ on CRL was not only inappropriate but also unlawful.

The Ministry of Justice is said to be considering an appeal.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.