Latest News

Sisters Lose Battle Over Father's Estate
Unrecorded Marriage Can Still be Terminated
HMRC Attack on Discounted Gift Scheme Succeeds
Council Defence Undone by Council Inspector
Landlords Lazy Over Cost Control
HMRC Crack Down on Foreign Property Tax Avoidance
Intention Sufficient Basis for Rectification of Will
C'est Bon, Le Pre-Nup
Conduct Determines Legal Ownership
Six-Figure Settlement for Botched Heart Surgery
If You do Not Understand it, Take Advice
Lotto Win Not Part of Family Assets
Government to Outlaw Squatting in Residential Premises
Father's Gifts to Daughter Challenged by Sister
Tribunal Confirms No Compensation for Rock Shareholders

Government to Outlaw Squatting in Residential Premises

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has now published its response to the recent consultation on proposals to criminalise squatting. The consultation paper, entitled ‘Options for dealing with squatting’, received over 2,000 responses. As a first step, the Government is proposing to make squatting in residential properties a criminal offence.

The offence would be committed where a person:

  • was in the building as a trespasser having entered as such;
  • knew or ought to have known that he or she was a trespasser; and
  • was living or intending to live in the building.

Section 7 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 already makes it a criminal offence for a trespasser to fail to leave residential premises when required to do so by or on behalf of a ‘displaced residential occupier’ or a ‘protected intending occupier’. While this allows those who are effectively made homeless by squatters to take action, it does not protect landlords or owners of second homes.

At present, the Government is not planning to criminalise squatting in commercial premises. Part of the reason for this is to prevent the occupation of buildings during protest activities from being caught by the new legislation. Crispin Blunt, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, said, “Stopping short of criminalising squatting in non-residential buildings represents a balanced compromise. Squatters who occupy genuinely abandoned or dilapidated non-residential buildings will not be committing the new offence, although their actions will rightly continue to be treated as a civil wrong and they can still be prosecuted for offences such as criminal damage or burglary. Neither will students who occupy academic buildings or workers who stage sit-ins to protest against an employer be caught by the offence.”

The legislation will not apply in situations where the property has previously been occupied legitimately, such as where tenants fall behind with their rent payments.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.